The rocj-cut sanctuary of Pico de San Gregorio, Santa Cruz de la Sierra, Cáceres
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.36707/palaeohispanica.v0i14.50Keywords:
Rock-cut Sanctuary., Pico de San Gregorio, Sacred landscape, Las Calderonas, San CristóbalAbstract
The current paper presents the new rock-cut assemblage of Pico de San Gregorio, set at the highest peak of Sierra de Santa Cruz, reflecting about its characteristics and its location in the landscape. It is also re-ferred the sites of Las Calderonas and San Cristóbal, included within the same geographical territory. Santuario Rupestre
References
Adams 2003: J. N.Adams, Bilingualism and the Latin Language, Cambridge, 2003.
Alfayé 2009; S. Alfayé,Santuarios y Rituales en la Hispania Celtica, Ox¬ford 2009.
Alfayé et al. 2001-02: S. Alfayé, B. Díaz, P. Rodríguez y A. Gonzalo, “Actuación arqueológica en la piedra de sacrificios humanos, Monreal de Ariza (Zaragoza)”, Kalathos 20-21, 2001-02, 251-259.
Almagro-Basch 1969: M. Almagro-Basch “De orfebrería céltica: el depósito de Berzocana y un brazelete del Museo Arqueológico Nacional”, TP 26, 1969, 275-294.
Almagro-Basch 1974:M. Almagro-Basch “Los tesoros de Sagradas y Berzocana y los torques de oro macizo del occidente peninsular”, en: IIICon¬greso Nacional de Arqueologia, 1974, 259-282.
Almagro-Gorbea y Jiménez 2000: M. Almagro-Gorbea y J. Jiménez, “Un altar rupestre en el prado de Lácara (Mérida). Apuntes para la creación de un parque arqueológico”, Extremadura Arqueológica 8, 2000, 423-442.
Almagro-Gorbea 1977: M. Almagro-Gorbea, El Bronce Final y el Período Orientalizante en Extremadura, Madrid 1977.
Angás 2005: J. Angás, “Santuarios como indicadores de frontera en el te¬rritorio noroccidental de Vulci (siglos VII-IIIa.C. Italia Centro-Tirré¬nica)”, Salduie 5, 2005, 65-94.
Barandela et al. 2005: I. Barandela, L. Castro, J. M. Lorenzo y R. Otero “Notas sobre los santuarios rupestres de la Gallaecia”, Minius 13, 2005, 47-68.
Beltrán 1975-76: M. Beltrán Lloris, “Aportaciones a la epigrafía y arqueo¬logía romana de Cáceres”, Caesaraugusta, 1975-76, 19-101.
Benito et al. 2003: L. Benito, H. A. Bernardo y M. Sánchez, Santuarios Rupestres Prehistóricos de Miranda do Douro (Portugal) y de su entorno de Zamora y Salamanca (España), 2 vols., Miranda do Douro-Salamanca 2003
Benito y Grande 1990: L. Benito y R. Grande, “San Pelayo, santuario rupestre de Almaraz de Duero (Zamora)”, Studia Zamorensia11, 1990, 9-23.
Benito y Grande 1992: L. Benito y R. Grande, Santuarios Rupestres Prehistóricos en las Provincias de Zamora y Salamanca,Zamora-Salamanca 1992.
Benito y Grande 1994: L. Benito y R. Grande, “Nuevos santuarios rupestres prehistóricos en las provincias de Zamora y Salamanca”, Zephyrus47, 1994, 113-131.
Benito y Grande 2000: L. Benito y R. Grande, Santuarios rupestres prehistóricos en el Centro-oeste de España, Salamanca 2000.
Berrocal-Rangel 1994: L. Berrocal-Rangel, El Altar Prerromano del Castrejón de Capote. Ensayo Etno-arqueológico de un ritual céltico en el Suroeste Peninsular, Madrid 1994.
Bettse.p.: E. Betts, “Sacred landscapes of Picenum, Marche”, en:Sacred Landscapes: creation, transformation, manipulation (Lampeter, 5-7 mayo de 2014).
Blanco y Corzo 1983: A. Blanco y J.R. Corzo, “Monte Algaida, un San-tuario Púnico en la desembocadura del Guadalquivir”,Historia 16, 8.87, 1983,123-128.
Burkert 1993: W.Burkert, Religião Grega na Época Clássica e Arcaica, Lisboa 1993.
Callejo 1962: C. Callejo, “Un lustro de investigaciones arqueológicas en la Alta Extremadura”, Revista de Estudios Extremeños18.2, 1962, 279-318.
Callejo y Blanco 1960: C. Callejo y A.Blanco, “Los torques de oro de Berzocana (Cáceres)”, Zephyrus 11, 1960, 250-255.
Caro 1634: R. Caro, Antigüedades y Principado de la ilustríssima ciudad de Sevilla y chorographia de su convento iurídico, o antigua chancillería,Sevilla 1634.
Celestino 2001: S. Celestino,Estelas de Guerrero y Estelas Diademadas. La precolonización y formación del mundo tartésico, Barcelona 2001.
Correia Santos 2009: M.J. Correia Santos, “Estelas diademadas: revisión de criterios de clasificación”, Herakleion 2, 2009, 7-40.
Correia Santos 2010:M.J. Correia Santos, “Santuários rupestres no Oci-dente da Hispania indo-europeia. Ensaio de tipologia e classificação”, PalHisp 10, 2010, 147-172.
Correia Santos 2012: M.J. Correia Santos, “La arqueologia, lo imaginário y lo real: el santuário rupestre de Mogueira (São Martinho de Mouros, Resende, Portugal)”, MM53, 2012, 455-496.
Correia Santos 2013: M.J. Correia Santos, “A Rocha da Mina e as Terras de Endovélico: conceito ou preconceito de paisagem sagrada?”, en: A.P. Fitas (coord.), Cadernos do Endovélico 1, Lisboa 2013, 143-148.
Correia Santos et al. 2014: M.J. Correia Santos, H. Pires y O. Sousa, “Nuevas lecturas de las inscripciones del santuario de Panóias (Vila Real, Portugal): resultados preliminares de un nuevo método de levantamiento epigráfico (CILII2395a, 2395b,2395c,2395d)”, Sylloge Epigraphica Barcinonensis12, 2014, e.p.
Correia Santos y Schattner 2010:M. J. Correia Santos y T. G. Schattner, “O Santuário do Cabeço das Fráguas através da arqueologia”, en: M. J. Correia Santos y T.G. Schattner (coords.), Actas da Jornada Porcom, Oilam, Taurom. Cabeço das Fráguas: o santuário no seu contexto(Guarda, 23 de Abril), (=Iberografias: Revista de Estudos Ibéricos 6), Guarda, 2010, 89-108.
Corzo 1991: J.R. Corzo, “Piezas etruscas del santuario de La Algaida (Sanlúcar de Barrameda, Cádiz)”, en: J. Remesal y O. Musso (eds.), La presencia de material etrusco en la Península Ibérica, Barcelona1991, 399-411.
Corzo 2000: J.R. Corzo, “El santuario de la Algaida (Sanlúcar de Barrameda, Cádiz) y la formación de sus talleres artesanales”, en: B. Costa y J. H. Fernández (eds.), Santuarios fenicio-púnicos en Iberia y su influencia en los cultos indígenas, 2000, 147-183.
Cressier 1992: P. Cressier, “Graffiti cristianos sobre monumentos musulmanes de la Andalucía Oriental: una forma de exorcismo popular”, en: P. Cressier(coord.), Estudios de arqueología medieval en Almería, Almería1992, 121-148.
de Hoz 2013: M. P. de Hoz, “Cultos griegos, cultos sincréticos y la inmi-gración griega y greco-oriental en la Península Ibérica”, en: M. P. de Hoz y G. Mora (eds.), El Oriente Griego en la Península Ibérica, Epigrafía y História, Madrid 2013, 205-254.
Drijvers 1980: H.J.W. Drijvers, Cults and Beliefs at Edessa, Leiden 1980.
Esteban et al. 2013: J. Esteban, J.A. Ramos y O. San Macario, “El altar rupestre de La Molineta (Trujillo) y su entorno arqueológico”, Boletín de la Real Academia de Extremadura de las Letras y las Artes21, 2013, 307-320.
Esteban y Salas 1993: J. Esteban y J. Salas, “El poblado y la necrópolis de La Coraja (Aldeacentenera, Cáceres)”, Cuadernos Emeritenses 7,1993, 55-112.
Fabián 2010: J.F. Fabián, “Altares rupestres, peñas sacras y rocas con cazoletas. Ocho nuevos casos abulenses y uno salmantino para la estadística, el debate y la reflexión”, MM 51, 2010, 222-267
Fita 1902: F. Fita, “Inscripción hemisférica de Santa Cruz y lápida de Solana de Cabañas”,BRAH40, 1902, 564-566.
Galán 1993: E. Galán,Estelas, paisaje y territorio en el Bronce Final del suroeste de la Península Ibérica, Madrid 1993.
García Quintela y Santos 2008: M. V. García y M. Santos,Santuarios de la Galicia Céltica. Arqueología del Paisaje y Religiones Comparadas en la Edad del Hierro, Madrid 2008.
García Quintela y Seoane 2011; M. V. García Quintela e Y. Seoane, “La larga vida de dos rocas ourensanas”,AEspA 84, 2011, 243-266.
García Quintela y Seoane 2013: M. V. García eY. Seoane, “Entre naturaleza y cultura: arquitectura ambigua en la Edad del Hierro del NO peninsular”, Gallaecia 32, 2013, 47-86.
García y Bellido 1967: A. García y Bellido, Les Religions Orientales dans l’Espagne romaine, Leiden 1967.
Gilotte 2010: S. Gilotte, Aux marges d’al-Andalus. Peuplement et habitat en Estrémadure centre-orientale (VIIIe-XIIIe siècles), 2 vols., Helsinki 2010.
González y Barroso 1996-03: A. González y R. Barroso, “El papel de las cazoletas y los cruciformes en la delimitación del espacio. Grabados y materiales del yacimiento de San Cristóbal (Valdemorales-Zarza de Montánchez, Cáceres)”, Norba 16, 1996-03, 75-121.
Guichard y Mischin 2002: P. Guichard y D. Mischin, “La société du Garb al-Andalus et les permiers husun”, en: I. C.F. Fernandes (coord.), Mil Anos de Fortificações na Península Ibérica e no Magreb (500-1500), Actas do Simpósio Internacional sobre Castelos, Lisboa 2002, 177-187.
Jiménez 2000: J. Jiménez, “Las Peñas Sacras como imago mundi del “centro cósmico” en el mundo indoeuropeo y céltico”, Trabalhos de Antropologia e Etnologia, 40.3-4, 2000, 101-116¬.
Manzarbeitia 2009: S. Manzarbeitia, “El árbol de Jesé”, Revista Digital de Iconografía Medieval1.2, 2009, 1-8.
Marco 1996: F. Marco,“Romanización y aculturación religiosa: Los santuarios rurales”, en: S. Reboreda Morillo y P. López Barja (eds), A Cidade e o Mundo: Romanización e cambio social, Xinzo de Limia, 1996, 83-100.
Martín 1999: A. M.Martín, Los Orígenes de Lusitania, El I milenio a.C. en la Alta Extremadura, Madrid 1999.
Melchor 2001: A. Melchor, Santa Cruz, la Sierra y su entorno, Badajoz 2001, 97-102.
Mélida 1902: J.R. Mélida,Catálogo Monumentalde Cáceres
Mena 1959: A. Mena,“Restos Prehistóricos en Santa Cruz de la Sierra”, Alcántara14, 1959, 41-44 .
Muñoz et al. 2005: M. Á. Muñoz, L. M. Serrano-Piedecasas, F. Paricio, P. Nogal y B. Gutiérrez, “El hisn de Sant Akrug (Santa Cruz de la Sierra, Cáceres)”, en: J. Clemente y J. L. de la Montaña (coords.),II Jornadas de Historia Medieval de Extremadura: ponencias y comunicaciones, Badajoz, 2005, 189-202.
Navareño 2012: A. Navareño,“Paisajismo de los castillos y fortalezas urbanas de la cuenca del Tajo en la Alta Extremadura”, en: Paisajes modelados por el agua: entre el arte y la ingeniería, Cáceres 2012, 355-374.
Ortega et al. 2014: J.A. Ortega, J. Estebán y O. de San Macario, “El complejo arqueológico de San Juan el Alto (Santa Cruz de la Sierra-Cáceres). Santuarios rupestres”, Alcántara 79, 2014, 11-28.
Pacheco 1991: J.A. Pacheco, Extremadura en los geógrafos árabes, Bada¬joz 1991.
Pérez 1992: M.Á. Pérez,Fuentes árabes de Extremadura, Badajoz1992.
Ramón 1955: J. Ramón, “Nuevos epígrafes romanos en tierras de Cáceres”, BRHA136, 1955, 252-287.
Redondo et al. 1991:J. A. Redondo, J. Estebán y J. Salas, El castro de La Coraja de Aldeacentenera, Cáceres, Mérida 1991.
Rieger e.p.: A.K. Rieger, “Analytical scale matters: topographical em-bedding and catchment areas of Graeco-Roman shared sacred places in the Hauran (Southern Syria), en:Sacred Landscapes: creation, trans¬formation, manipulation (Lampeter, 5-7 mayo de 2014).
Rodríguez et al. 2013: A. Rodríguez, I. Pavón, D. M. Duque, M. Ponce deLeón, M. A. Hunt y C. Merideth,“La explotación tartésica de la casi¬terita entre los ríos Tajo y Guadiana: San Cristóbal de Logrosán (Cáceres)”, TP 70.1, 2013, 95-113.
Roso 1902: M. Roso, “Excavaciones en la Sierra de Santa Cruz”,Revista de Extremadura4.34, 1902,253-259.
Roso 1903: M. Roso, “La escritura ógmica en Extremadura”, BRHA44, 1903, 357-359.
Roso 1905: M. Roso, “Nuevas inscripciones romanas de la región Nor-bense”, BRHA47, 1905, 60-71.
Rubio et al. 2008: M. Rubio, F. J. Rubio y M. I. Rubio, “El poblado de la Edad del Hierro de San Juan el Alto de Santa Cruz de la Sierra”, en:Actas de los XXXVIColoquios Históricos de Extremadura,II, Badajoz 2008, 683-713.
Ruiz-Gálvez y Galán 1991: M. Ruiz-Gálvez y E. Galán,“Las estelas del Suroeste como hitos de vías ganaderas y rutas comerciales”, TP 48, 1991, 257-273.
Sánchez-Corriendo 1997: J. Sánchez-Corriendo, “Bandidos lusitanos o pas¬tores trashumantes?: apuntes para el estudio de la trashumancia en Hispania”, Hispania Antiqua21, 1997, 69-92.
Santos Júnior et al. 1989: J.R. Santos Júnior, A.M. Freitas, A. Costa, N. Santos Júnior, “O Santuário do Castelo do Mau Vizinho”, Revista de Guimarães99, 1989, 375-381.
Sarmento 1884: F. M. Sarmento, “Materiais para a arqueologia do concelho de Guimarães”, Revista de Guimarães1.4, 1884, 161-189.
Seoane et al. 2013: Y. Seoane, M. V. García y A. Güimil, “Las pilas del castro de Santa Mariña de Maside (Ourense): hacia una tipología de los lugares con función ritual en la Edad del Hierro del NWde la Península Ibérica”, Cuadernos de Estudios Gallegos60.126, 2013, 13-50.
Soria 1983: V. Soria, “Nuevos descubrimientos de arqueología extremeña”, Revista de Estudios Extremeños 39.3, 1983, 501-510.
Steelee.p.: L. Steele, “Transforming landscape: exploring the creation of a sacred landscape in Northeast Cyprus at the beginning of the Late Bronze Age”, en:Sacred Landscapes: creation, transformation, manipulation (Lampeter, 5-7 mayo de 2014).
Szabóe.p.: C. Szabó, “Sacred landscapes of Roman Dacia”, en:Sacred Landscapes: creation, transformation, manipulation (Lampeter, 5-7 mayo de 2014).
Tente y Lourenço 2000: C. Tente y S. Lourenço, “O Cadeirão da quinta do Pé do Coelho e o Penedo dos Mouros: primeira interpretação como santuários rupestres”, Revista de Guimarães, volume especial, Actas do Congresso de Proto-história Europeia, vol. 2, Guimarães 2000, 775-792.
Terrón 1971: M. Terrón, El solar de los Aftásidas. Aportación temática al estudio del reino moro de Badajoz. Siglo XI,Badajoz 1971.
Torres 1999: M. Torres,Sociedad y mundo funerario en Tartessos, Madrid 1999.
Torres 2002: M. Ortiz, Tartessos: la cultura orientalizante en la Península Ibérica, Madrid2002.
Vasconcelos 1905: J.L. de Vasconcelos,Religiões da Lusitânia, vol. II, Lis¬boa 1905.
Vaz 2002: J.L.I. Vaz,“Tipologia dos santuários rupestres de tradição paleohispânica em território português”, en: J. Cardim Ribeiro (ed.), Loquuntur Saxa, Religiões da Lusitânia, Lisboa 2002, 39-42.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Professional standards and ethical policies
a) Palaeohispanica’s editorial board
Details concerning the journal’s internal organization can be found at this website.
b) Authors’ responsibilities
As an implicit condition for publishing in Palaeohispanica, authors are expected to adhere to all the ethical and professional principles that are shared across all research fields and academic publications. By submitting a contribution for peer review, potential authors guarantee that their work is original, that it constitutes a significant contribution to its research field and has not been published elsewhere.
All submitted manuscripts ought to contain bibliographic references at the end of the paper as well as an indication of how the research that culminated in the article was funded.
Likewise, authors must agree to incorporate any relevant changes that peer reviewers suggest as well as to include any recommendations that the editorial committee includes in the manuscript’s proofs at the end of the editorial process.
The journal expects its authors, reviewers, editors and staff members to all conduct themselves professionally by treating others with respect and civility. Should any sort of untoward situation arise, such as (self) plagiarism, conflicts of interest or aggressive behaviour on the author’s part, the following actions will be taken:
- Plagiarism and the republication of articles
Plagiarism is defined as the reproduction of a text or other materials found in different publications without the original source being adequately cited. Accordingly, material can still be plagiarized even when it has been tweaked or paraphrased. Plagiarism constitutes a serious ethical violation; furthermore, there can be legal ramifications for violating an author’s rights in cases where the reproduced material has been previously published. Authors who want to cite published work must do so by including complete references to the original materials and by including any quotations within quotation marks. Graphs and images can only be reproduced with the express permission of the original author and must include a citation below said image or graphic according to the rules laid out on the journal’s website. If a peer reviewer or the editorial board detects any instance of plagiarism (whether of one’s own or another’s work), the manuscript will automatically be disqualified.
- Conflicts of interest
In most instances an individual who works at the same institution as an author or one of the co-authors is automatically barred from evaluating a potential contribution. The journal’s editors must always be aware of possible conflicts of interest and are required to recuse themselves from any decision-making process, whenever there is even the appearance of a possible conflict of interest.
c) The peer-review process
Palaeohispanica employs peers to evaluate externally all contributions, with this being understood as obtaining the opinion of an established expert over the merits of every potential contribution. In addition to completing the relevant form, reviewers are expected to suggest any pertinent bibliography that was not included in the original version of the manuscript.
Furthermore, the peer-review process is double blind, meaning that both authors’ anonymity as well as the reviewers’ impartiality and independence are guaranteed. Reader reviews will be treated with the utmost confidentiality. As is the case with all respectable research journals, the editors of Palaeohispanicawill not share with a third party the identity of a peer reviewer, the contents of his or her review or any correspondence resulting from the review process. Likewise, reviewers are required to adhere to the same strict standard of confidentiality: neither manuscripts nor the contents of any correspondence between an author and the editors can be shared with a third party without the written and express consent of the journal’s editors.
While strictly speaking authors are not held to the same standards (they can, for instance, solicit advice from co-authors and colleagues as they revise and amend a manuscript in accordance with the recommendations found in a reviewer’s report), the public airing of a reviewer’s report or of the correspondence with the editorial team constitutes untoward behavior. Any author who acts in such a way will automatically forfeit his or her right to the journal’s confidentiality.
- Aggressive behaviour
Should the editorial committee be made aware of any untoward behaviour on the author’s part towards external reviewers, other authors or the journal’s editors/staff, that author’s submission will immediately be withdrawn from the consideration process.
All participants in the publication process, including editors, authors, peer reviewers, and member’s of the journal’s staff are expected to meet basic standards of professional courtesy and to respect the fundamental rules and guidelines concerning the peer-review and publication processes. Under any circumstance, personal attacks and verbal assault (whether expressed orally or through writing) are completely unacceptable. Accordingly, the journal reserves the right to reject the contribution of any author who repeatedly violates these principles or refuses to cooperate with the editors and reviewers during the normal evaluation and publication processes.
d) Editorial ethics
The editorial team at Palaeohispanica will bring an end to any dishonest research practice by submitting every proposal to a careful review process that will begin before the selection of possible peer reviewers. Should anything questionable be detected, an author will be asked to provide relevant explanations and then be told to review his/her text so as to meet the journal’s quality standards. If an author does not make the requested changes, the manuscript will not be submitted for double-blind peer review and, accordingly, will not be published. The editorial board is always available to discuss and debate with authors any misunderstanding that could have given rise to such a situation.
e) Copyright and journal access
Journal content falls under the protection of licence Creative Commons CC BY-NC-SA. Access the all journal content is open and free of charge.
f) Journal archive
Given that the Institución Fernando el Católico is an established and important publishing house, it is extremely unlikely that access to the journal’s contents could be compromised in anyway within the foreseeable future. The contents of Palaeohispanica will be stored in IFC’s servers even if the journal ceases to be published.
g) Ownership and management of the journal
The journal Palaeohispanica is edited and run by the institution «Fernando el Católico», an independent entity of the Excelentísima Diputación de Zaragoza.
Names and email addresses submitted to this journal will only be used for tasks related to the journal and will not be shared with any third party or used for any other purpose.
In accordance with the Regulation UE 2016/679, information gathered by the Institución Fernando el Católico de la Excma. Diputación de Zaragoza (IFC) will be used for carrying out the functions of an academic publication, the handling of claims, appeals, complaints, suggestions, surveys as well as any other activity involved in the management of the journal.
Cubic Factory is in charge of handling said data. They can be contacted at cubic@cubicfactory.com.
Data can be given to public agencies with the relevant competencies and in case of legal obligations.
Those who are interested can exercise their rights of access, correction, suppression, limitation of the use, opposition and portability by contacting ifc@dpz.es.
Users can also go to the Agencia Española de Protección de Datos to make any complaints that they feel is necessary.
User information will be kept during the period in which it is needed to complete the task for which said information was provided in the first place or for the period necessary to comply with any legal obligations. Once a given objective has been completed, personal data that is not part of fulfillment of public service will be blocked until the applicable period has ended.
Ethical and confidentiality policy of Palaeohispanica can be consulted here.
Privacy policy
Names and email addresses submitted to this journal will only be used for tasks related to the journal and will not be shared with any third party or used for any other purpose.
In accordance with the Regulation UE 2016/679, information gathered by the Institución Fernando el Católico de la Excma. Diputación de Zaragoza (IFC) will be used for carrying out the functions of an academic publication, the handling of claims, appeals, complaints, suggestions, surveys as well as any other activity involved in the management of the journal.
Cubic Factory is in charge of handling said data. They can be contacted at cubic@cubicfactory.com.
Data can be given to public agencies with the relevant competencies and in case of legal obligations.
Those who are interested can exercise their rights of access, correction, suppression, limitation of the use, opposition and portabilityby contacting ifc@dpz.es.
Users can also go to the Agencia Española de Protección de Datos to make any complaints that they feel is necessary.
User information will be kept during the period in which it is needed to complete the task for which said information was provided in the first place or for the period necessary to comply with any legal obligations. Once a given objective has been completed, personal data that is not part of fulfillment of public service will be blocked until the applicable period has ended.
The IFC’s privacy and data protection policy can be consulted at https://tiendaifc.dpz.es/Sites/dpz/paginasPersonalizadas/Modelo2/inicio.aspx. It can also be found in the journal’s the top navigation menu: http://ifc.dpz.es/ojs/index.php/palaeohispanica/dpd
Names and email addresses submitted to this journal will only be used for tasks related to the journal and will not be shared with any third party or used for any other purpose.
In accordance with the Regulation UE 2016/679, information gathered by the Institución Fernando el Católico de la Excma. Diputación de Zaragoza (IFC) will be used for carrying out the functions of an academic publication, the handling of claims, appeals, complaints, suggestions, surveys as well as any other activity involved in the management of the journal.
Cubic Factory is in charge of handling said data. They can be contacted at cubic@cubicfactory.com.
Data can be given to public agencies with the relevant competencies and in case of legal obligations.
Those who are interested can exercise their rights of access, correction, suppression, limitation of the use, opposition and portability by contacting ifc@dpz.es.
Users can also go to the Agencia Española de Protección de Datos to make any complaints that they feel is necessary.
User information will be kept during the period in which it is needed to complete the task for which said information was provided in the first place or for the period necessary to comply with any legal obligations. Once a given objective has been completed, personal data that is not part of fulfillment of public service will be blocked until the applicable period has ended.
Ethical and confidentiality policy of Palaeohispanica can be consulted here.
